My new book "Building Green Software" from O'Reilly


As well as writing SciFi, I also write non-fiction books and my most recent is Building Green Software from O'Reilly Media. 

People often ask how writing non-fiction and fiction books differ. The answer is both utterly and hardly at all.

I had to research Building Green Software extensively, but I also research my science fiction books. I even used some of the same reviewers. (Well, one!) 

A thriller has to be page turning and you need to consider pace, but I would argue that is equally true of a non-fiction book. When you write any book, you have to plan how you will persuade readers to keep reading it. A plot keeps folk reading your novels, but why not use the same techniques for non-fiction?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

About Utopia Five (With No Spoilers!)

Image
I’m doing my first book club chat this month on Utopia Five and I’m about to release a new edit. All of that has made me think back on the original idea: what if you had a computer game that simulated reality well enough to make changes in the past and see the result? How would you make something like that? For starters, you’d need a heck of a lot of data: 100% world camera coverage. Second, I decided the data would have to be public. I wanted the game invented by a person, not Google. So, I introduced an Open Panopticon in 2025 and the story takes place thirty years later.  The title of Utopia Five is a hat tip to Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five - the protagonists of both can time travel in their own lifetime. Lee Sands was born the day the Panopticon was turned on and the game is a virtual time machine, which sees back to that moment and no further. I was worried I’d laid that reference on a bit thick, but nobody seemed to notice, demonstrating that authors don’t have a clue ...
Read more

Does the Future Exist?

Image
Unusually, this isn’t a comment on climate change and the impending doom of humanity - I suspect at least a couple of us will scrape through. No, it’s about how when I type “a future” into one of Google's docs, it suggests I change it to “the future”. Has autocorrect finally become sentient and it's trying to tell me something?  Spelling I can live with. Attempting to alter my fundamental beliefs about the nature of reality feels like overreach. As a science fiction writer whose books are set in a world that's supposed to be realistic, this is clearly something that interests me. My last book was set in three different time periods and it occurred to me I might want to do some mucking around the past and future, but could I? Would it break my rule that you can't bend the laws of physics? Fate When we talk about the future, there’s an implication it’s an actual thing. In fact, whether there’s a defined fate in store for us or not is a fundamental physical and philosophic...
Read more

Book Review - "Project Hail Mary" by Andy Weir

Image
  Surely there is no one who loves scifi who doesn't also love Andy Weir's debut novel, "The Martian". That must make writing any further books a tough proposition, although probably not the worst problem to have as an author. Like its predecessor, "Project Hail Mary" is a geek-MCed and, very much, geek-targeted adventure story. This time, the action takes place light years from Earth with, again, technology based mostly on what we have now or are likely to develop in the next few decades. It's that realism that makes Weir almost (ahem) unique and a breath of STEM fresh air. The main character is slightly different, although you'd also have a pint with this one, even if he hadn't just come back from a ripping Boy's Own extraplanetary excursion. Although an astronaut, the new MC is established as not "the right stuff" with some faults shoehorned-in to make him more humanly fallible and add extra tension to the plot. Not that extra pe...
Read more